Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3607 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $35.67 vs $375.64
- Up to 87% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.21 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1820 - 225 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
168
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7382 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
13%
Price, €
€375.64
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €375.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7382 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |