Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3427 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 134% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron 847 - 460 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
460
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €106.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |