Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1183 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $171.83 vs $255.18
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.47 vs $0.63 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 453 vs 404 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
404
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€190.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Buy for €283.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |