Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1547 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $197.42 vs $392.64
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-12900K - $1.46 vs $2.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 163 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
150
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19039 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
54%
Price, €
€435.83
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €435.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |