Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 30% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-2500 - 491 vs 377 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i5-2500
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $110.28 vs $401.89
- Up to 65% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.32 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €446.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
377
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |