Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Core i5-2500
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $122.41 vs $341.19
- Up to 54% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.38 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 29% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-2500 - 414 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 24 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
322
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6953 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
414
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
46%
Price, €
€341.19
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6953 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |