Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 197 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $29.18 vs $168.18
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $0.19 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
20%
Price, €
€186.68
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |