Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 19% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3900 - 285 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $29.18 vs $76.77
- Up to 53% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 5600X - $0.14 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
46.66666666666667%
Price, €
€85.22
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €85.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5967 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
239
83.85964912280703%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5963 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
27.772466539196937%
Multi-Core
992
11.456288254994803%
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |