Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 50% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3930 - 238 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $19.74 vs $95.05
- Up to 68% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.14 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €105.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
159
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €21.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |