Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 141% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6300 - 571 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $42.42 vs $292.47
- Up to 65% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 7600X - $0.2 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
571
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
35%
Price, €
€324.64
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €324.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for €47.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |