Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 44% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6300 - 130 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $71.68 vs $153.55
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Buy for €79.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |