Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than FX-6300 - 189 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $54.14 vs $190.11
- Up to 70% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-13600K - $0.34 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
30%
Price, €
€211.02
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Buy for €60.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |