Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2299 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4160 - 264 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $14.62 vs $87.67
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 5600X - $0.07 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €97.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
227
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Vermeer | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |