Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3375 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4160 - 234 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $185.81 vs $320.62
- Up to 32% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-14900K - $1.04 vs $1.52 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
68.42105263157895%
Price, €
€355.89
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €355.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
199
85.04273504273505%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
34.31151241534989%
Multi-Core
2072
9.866666666666667%
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |