Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 2492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610 - 257 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $27.05 vs $110.41
- Up to 73% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - $0.13 vs $0.48 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
27%
Price, €
€122.55
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €122.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
233
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |