Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3258 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1610 - 161 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $27.05 vs $116.36
- Up to 74% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-12600KF - $0.21 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
26%
Price, €
€129.16
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €129.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
144
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |