Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 921 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Ryzen 3 3250U - 173 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 64 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | EPYC |
Picasso | Codename | Naples |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |