Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled - 74 vs 59 FPS
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $2162.15 vs $3693.68
- Up to 27% better value when playing Starfield than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $36.65 vs $49.91 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
74
100%
Value, €/FPS
€49.91/FPS
73%
Price, €
€3693.68
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,693.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
FPS
59
80%
Value, €/FPS
€36.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2162.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,162.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
73%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD |
