Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 115% better in Battlefield IV than MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR - 236 vs 110 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
110
47%
Value, €/FPS
€7.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€782.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €782.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 356646 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
40%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-10500
3.1 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1519
63%
Multi-Core
5470
48%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i5-10500 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 24 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
