Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP Victus 15.6" FHD IPS 144Hz on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 16% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than HP Victus 15.6" FHD IPS 144Hz - 78 vs 67 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
May 1st, 2024
FPS
78
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
FPS
67
86%
Value, €/FPS
€12.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€819.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €819.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2251
96%
Multi-Core
12037
100%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook | vs | HP Victus 15.6" FHD IPS 144Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
