Key Differences
In short — Asus TUF A16 outperforms MSI Katana GF76 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Katana GF76 - 87 vs 80 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
10th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€980.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €980.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
10th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
86%
Multi-Core
9281
86%
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
