Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 750 Ti on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 1266 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Advantages of Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 120% better in Starfield than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 33 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Up to 65% cheaper than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $133.87 vs $383.86
- Up to 23% better value when playing Starfield than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $9.91 vs $12.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 60 vs 295 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
FPS
33
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.91/FPS
77%
Price, €
€426.08
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €426.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
FPS
15
45%
Value, €/FPS
€9.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
11%
Radeon RX Vega 64 | vs | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 18th, 2014 |
Vega | Generation | GeForce 700 |
$499 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
2048-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
1247 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1020 MHz |
1546 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1085 MHz |
945 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1350 MHz |