The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $236.90 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- Up to 56% cheaper – $189.18 vs $426.08
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 50 vs 295 Watts
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, €
€426.08
44%
Value, €/FPS
€4.73/FPS
85%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
52%
Min 1% FPS
20
41%
Price, €
€189.18
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€189.18
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€72.06
In Stock
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
10%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX Vega 64 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 7th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
$499.00 | MSRP | $79.00 |
Vega | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
295 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
2048-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
98.94 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
395.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
12.66 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |