The Radeon RX 6650 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $154.74 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 2% less energy – 176 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 38% cheaper – $251.35 vs $406.09
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R9 270X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€406.09
61%
Value, €/FPS
€3.79/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€406.09
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,639.34
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
48%
Min 1% FPS
23
38%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
77%
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R9 270X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R9 270X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R9 270X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
64%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
25%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
176 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
280.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
168.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 33.6 GPixel/s |
337.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 84 GTexel/s |
10.79 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |
