The Radeon RX 6650 XT is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 4100, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $1531.21 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 93% cheaper – $108.13 vs $1639.34
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 50 vs 176 Watts
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€1639.34
6%
Value, €/FPS
€15.32/FPS
14%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
46%
Min 1% FPS
21
35%
Price, €
€108.13
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
34%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
23%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 176 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
280.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
168.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.22 GPixel/s |
337.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 76.86 GTexel/s |
10.79 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.46 TFLOPS |
