The Radeon RX 6550M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6550M
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 80 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
70
67%
Min 1% FPS
36
62%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€180.17
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€215.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€476.58
In Stock
Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
144 GB/s
32%
Pixel Fillrate
90.88 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
181.8 GTexel/s
60%
FP32
5.816 TFLOPS
60%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6550M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
80 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 144 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 90.88 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 181.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 5.816 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
