The Radeon RX 5700 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $72.07 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- Up to 40% cheaper – $108.10 vs $180.17
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 175 vs 225 Watts
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
€180.17
59%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
86%
Buy on Amazon
€180.17
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€485.59
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€476.58
In Stock
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
70%
Min 1% FPS
37
64%
Price, €
€108.1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
41%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
73%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
73%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Navi | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
121.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
304.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
9.754 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
