The Radeon RX 480 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $117.12 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 480
- Up to 30% cheaper – $269.37 vs $386.49
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 70 vs 150 Watts
Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Average FPS
68
81%
Min 1% FPS
34
76%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.96/FPS
100%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€386.49
69%
Value, €/FPS
€4.6/FPS
86%
Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
37%
Texture Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
96%
FP32
5.834 TFLOPS
48%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 480 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$229.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 40.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
| 182.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 5.834 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
