The Radeon RX 460 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $321.61 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- Up to 67% cheaper – $154.97 vs $476.58
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 75 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
59%
Min 1% FPS
22
47%
Price, €
€154.97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.03/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, €
€476.58
32%
Value, €/FPS
€5.47/FPS
55%
Buy on Amazon
€476.58
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€810.80
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€359.46
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€438.73
In Stock
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
26%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
26%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
19.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
67.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
2.15 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |