Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the more expensive Radeon RX 460 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 988 days newer than the more expensive Radeon RX 460.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Radeon RX 460 - 105 vs 96 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Radeon RX 460 - $93.32 vs $139.61
- Up to 39% better value when playing Rust than Radeon RX 460 - $0.99 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 460 - 4 vs 2 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €154.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
105
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €103.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon RX 460 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1090 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |