The Radeon R9 390 is a clear winner – it's a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $45.04 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 14% cheaper – $269.37 vs $314.41
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 75 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
96%
Min 1% FPS
31
94%
Price, €
€314.41
85%
Value, €/FPS
€4.91/FPS
82%
Buy on Amazon
€314.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€246.35
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€202.61
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€314.52
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
83%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
58%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
58%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $329.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
