The Radeon R9 295X2 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5080. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 295X2
The GeForce RTX 5080 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5080
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 360 vs 500 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 5080 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Average FPS
67
31%
Min 1% FPS
33
24%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5080
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
214
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, €
€1779.27
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.31/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€1,779.27
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€2,148.64
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,972.96
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,872.97
In Stock
Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 5080 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 5080 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs GeForce RTX 5080 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
20%
FP32
5.733 TFLOPS
10%
GeForce RTX 5080
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
960 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
335 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
879.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
56.28 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5080 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
$1,499.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
500 W | Power Consumption | 360 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 960 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
65.15 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 335 GPixel/s |
179.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 879.3 GTexel/s |
5.733 TFLOPS | FP32 | 56.28 TFLOPS |