The Radeon R9 295X2 is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 580. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon RX 580 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 580
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 185 vs 500 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 580 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Average FPS
67
96%
Min 1% FPS
33
94%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 580
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
€126.12
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€126.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€224.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 580 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 580 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 580 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
93%
FP32
5.733 TFLOPS
93%
Radeon RX 580
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
80%
Pixel Fillrate
42.88 GPixel/s
66%
Texture Fillrate
193 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.175 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $1,499.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 185 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
65.15 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 42.88 GPixel/s |
| 179.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 193 GTexel/s |
| 5.733 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.175 TFLOPS |
