The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $1397.29 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 85% cheaper – $251.35 vs $1648.64
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 180 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
31%
Min 1% FPS
23
23%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, €
€1648.64
15%
Value, €/FPS
€10.17/FPS
48%
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
8%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
8%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 350 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 556 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.58 TFLOPS |
