The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $225.23 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 47% cheaper – $251.35 vs $476.58
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
59%
Min 1% FPS
23
49%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, €
€476.58
52%
Value, €/FPS
€5.47/FPS
90%
Buy on Amazon
€476.58
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€810.80
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€359.46
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€438.73
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
33%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
33%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |
