The Radeon R9 270X is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $101.85 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050
- Up to 41% cheaper – $149.50 vs $251.35
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 75 vs 180 Watts
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, €
€251.35
59%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
60%
GeForce GTX 1050
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
22
96%
Price, €
€149.5
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.93/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€149.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€104.50
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
72%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
63%
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
69%
FP32
1.862 TFLOPS
69%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 46.56 GPixel/s |
84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 58.2 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.862 TFLOPS |
