The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6600 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 150 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6600 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
48%
Min 1% FPS
22
37%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Jul 30th, 2021
Average FPS
105
100%
Min 1% FPS
59
100%
Price, €
€466.23
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.44/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€466.23
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€536.04
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€450.44
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
22%
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Jul 30th, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.6 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2021 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 160 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 165.7 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 331.4 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.6 TFLOPS |
