The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7600. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
The Radeon PRO W7600 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 13% less energy – 130 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon PRO W7600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
47%
Min 1% FPS
22
37%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€521.62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.87/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon PRO W7600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon PRO W7600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon PRO W7600 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
12%
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.99 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 156.2 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 312.3 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.99 TFLOPS |
