The Radeon R7 260X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $626.13 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Up to 78% cheaper – $180.17 vs $806.30
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 115 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
29%
Min 1% FPS
21
20%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.67/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, €
€806.3
22%
Value, €/FPS
€4.74/FPS
77%
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
18%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
8%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |