The Radeon R7 260X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $718.93 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Up to 80% cheaper – $180.17 vs $899.10
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 115 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
61%
Min 1% FPS
21
50%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.67/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, €
€899.1
20%
Value, €/FPS
€11.23/FPS
33%
Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
31%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
33%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
33%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
| 61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |
