The Radeon R7 260X is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $25.20 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
The Radeon RX 460 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 14% cheaper – $154.97 vs $180.17
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 75 vs 115 Watts
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
96%
Min 1% FPS
21
95%
Price, €
€180.17
86%
Value, €/FPS
€3.67/FPS
83%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
22
100%
Price, €
€154.97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.03/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
93%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
92%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
92%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
92%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
| $139.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 115 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
| 61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |
