The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
57%
Min 1% FPS
20
45%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€171.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€171.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€172.40
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€208.09
In Stock
Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
28%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
17%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |
