The Radeon R5 M230 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 M230
The GeForce RTX 3050 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 M230 vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 M230
Jan 7th, 2014
Average FPS
40
48%
Min 1% FPS
15
34%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€171.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€171.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€172.40
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€208.09
In Stock
Radeon R5 M230 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 M230 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 M230 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 M230
Jan 7th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
16 GB/s
7%
Pixel Fillrate
4.88 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
12.2 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
390.4 GFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 M230 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 16 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 4.88 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
| 12.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
| 390.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |
