The Radeon R5 240 OEM is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $201.81 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 80% cheaper – $49.54 vs $251.35
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 50 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 270X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
78%
Min 1% FPS
15
65%
Price, €
€49.54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, €
€251.35
19%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
25%
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 270X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 270X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon R9 270X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
8%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
22%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 33.6 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 84 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |
