The Radeon 760M is at least much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 760M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 15 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
56
77%
Min 1% FPS
26
70%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€171.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€171.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€207.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€172.25
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€230.68
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
41.58 GPixel/s
88%
Texture Fillrate
83.17 GTexel/s
79%
FP32
5.323 TFLOPS
79%
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
47.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.774 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Feb 2nd, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179.00 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 96-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 168 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.58 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 47.04 GPixel/s |
| 83.17 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 105.8 GTexel/s |
| 5.323 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.774 TFLOPS |
