Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 465 outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 465 is 1429 days older than Radeon R9 295X2.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 200 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 - 4 vs 1 GB
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
GeForce GTX 465
Desktop • May 31st, 2010
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 465
Desktop • May 31st, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
13.38 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
26.75 GTexel/s
14%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| May 31st, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $279 | MSRP | $1499 |
| 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 102.7 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 608 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 802 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
