Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 465 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1373 days newer than GeForce GTX 465.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 33% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GTX 465 - 32 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 - 3 vs 1 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 465
Desktop • May 31st, 2010
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 465
Desktop • May 31st, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
13.38 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
26.75 GTexel/s
25%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| May 31st, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $279 | MSRP | $279 |
| 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 102.7 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 608 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 802 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
