Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2109 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 69 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 61% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than GeForce GT 240 - 58 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 4 vs 1 GB
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce GT 240
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| $80 | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
