Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 1421 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 69 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 32% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GT 240 - 45 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 3 vs 1 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GT 240
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $80 | MSRP | $299 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
