The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 250. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 15 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is better in every way
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 250 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Sep 5th, 2014
Average FPS
42
100%
Min 1% FPS
17
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
100%
Min 1% FPS
16
94%
Price, €
€67.55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 250 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 250 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 250 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Sep 5th, 2014
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
844.8 GFLOPS
89%
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 14.8 GPixel/s |
52.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 29.6 GTexel/s |
| 844.8 GFLOPS | FP32 | 947.2 GFLOPS |
