Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms HD Graphics 630 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 369 days older than HD Graphics 630 Mobile.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 630 Mobile
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 18% better in Minecraft than HD Graphics 630 Mobile - 589 vs 499 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
HD Graphics 630 Mobile
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 630 Mobile
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
3 GPixel/s
4%
Texel Fillrate
24 GTexel/s
9%
Intel HD Graphics 630 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
